
Originally Posted by
kuroi
If you're referring to us, then you need to check your facts.
The last version that we released (4.7) worked perfectly. It was extensively tested before release and we did over two dozen hands-on investigations of bug reports post-release (i.e. going onto people's servers and checking the problem) and in every single case, the cause was one or other of two specific installation issues (about which we've posted several times - i.e. not overwriting files properly or leaving backs of the class files).
We stopped supporting it when other people started releasing variants that incorporated their pet ideas without proper testing, leading to bugs and missing files, and it seems to have continued downhill since.
We were very happy to support our own professionally written and tested code, but cleaning up other people's messes? No.
We have a completely re-written version that we use on clients' sites, but it's exactly this sort of ill-informed comment quoted that dissuades us from incurring the time and expense of packaging it up for release to the general community.
Bookmarks